- Who is 11-year-old YouTube star Matty B, and why is everyone so mad at him?
- A guy you've never heard of now hosts one of YouTube's most popular shows
- Three cheers for Hannah Hart's 'My Drunk Kitchen' cookbook
- I had my emoji use analyzed, and the results were grim
- Yahoo researchers try to understand the mythical Tumblr
- How Tina Belcher became everyone's favorite awkward teen hero
- The YouTube celebrity culture debate: How can creators and fans coexist?
- Wong Fu and the secrets of DIY YouTube stardom
- 8 people who are doing comedy right on Vine
- What it's really like to work for a YouTube star
- Teen commits suicide after posting a haunting message on YouTube
- The silent struggle against WhatsApp's tick system
- Meet the 5 companies trying to beat YouTube at its own game
- Teens love spoofing the 'Life Alert' commercial on Vine
- Behind the fractured folk tales of MC Frontalot’s ‘Question Bedtime’
- Meet Barbara Dunkelman: Internet celebrity, community manager, superhero
- This young girl is leading a revolution—via YouTube, 6,000 miles from home
- Here's how to become the ultimate Tumblr power user
- VidCon 2014: A tale of 2 conventions
From The Kernel Archives
Online store provider Limited Run has dubbed Facebook “scumbags”, claiming the social network is holding their company name to ransom, demanding $2,000 a month in advertising spend before allowing the company to update its details, following a change in name from Limited Pressing to Limited Run.
“While we were testing Facebook ads, we were also trying to get Facebook to let us change our name,” wrote a representative for the company on its Facebook page, “Because we’re not Limited Pressing any more. We contacted them on many occasions about this. Finally, we got a call from someone at Facebook. They said they would allow us to change our name … But only if we agreed to spend $2000 or more in advertising a month.
“That’s correct. Facebook was holding our name hostage. So we did what any good hardcore kids would do. We cursed that piece of shit out! Damn we were so pissed. We still are. This is why we need to delete this page and move away from Facebook. They’re scumbags and we just don’t have the patience for scumbags.”
Perhaps even more controversially, the company claims: “While testing [Facebook's] ad system, we noticed some very strange things. Facebook was charging us for clicks, yet we could only verify about 20% of them actually showing up on our site. At first, we thought it was our analytics service. We tried signing up for a handful of other big name companies, and still, we couldn’t verify more than 15-20% of clicks.
“So we did what any good developers would do. We built a page logger. Any time a page was loaded, we’d keep track of it. You know what we found? The 80% of clicks we were paying for were from bots.”
The company is clear to stress that it is not accusing Facebook of improper behaviour and that it cannot prove where the bots originated, but that they were loading pages and driving up the company’s advertising costs unacceptably.
Facebook did not immediately return a request for comment.Filed under Archived Story, Report | Comment (0)